Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for supporting this site!

PulseGear X1 Pro Review: Is This Budget fitness tracker Worth Your Money?

First Impressions & Unboxing

• Box contents: tracker, charging cable, user manual, and two extra bands – all neatly packed without excess plastic.
• Build quality: lightweight matte plastic with a responsive 1.4-inch touchscreen. Feels durable but not premium.
• Initial setup: quick Bluetooth 5.0 pairing via the PulseSync app, firmware update took 3 minutes.

Design, Display & Comfort

• Screen: 1.4-inch AMOLED, 240×240 resolution – bright enough outdoors, but smudges easily.
• Band and fit: silicone band is soft and adjustable; no skin irritation after 8 hours of wear during sleep tracking.
• Water resistance: IP68 rating – survived a 30-minute swim and a shower without issues.

Core Features & Accuracy

• Step tracking: Within 2% of manual count on a 1,000-step test. GPS (connected) works well for outdoor runs.
• heart rate monitor: Optical sensor matched a chest strap within ±5 bpm during steady-state cardio, but lagged during HIIT.
• Sleep tracking: Accurately detected deep/light sleep phases; missed a 45-minute nap once.

Battery Life & Charging

• Claimed vs real: 7 days with always-on display off; 4 days with AOD on. Heavy GPS use drops it to 2 days.
• Charging speed: 0-100% in 90 minutes via proprietary magnetic cable (USB-A). No fast charge support.
• Standby drain: Minimal – lost only 3% overnight without notifications.

Software, App Experience & Notifications

• PulseSync app: Clean layout with daily trends, but syncs slowly (10-15 seconds). No web dashboard.
• Notifications: Reliable for calls, texts, and WhatsApp; cannot reply, and emoji display is glitchy.
• Customization: 20+ watch faces, limited to 4 complications each. Workout profiles lack auto-detect for weightlifting.

Pros & Cons

• Pros: Affordable price ($79), bright AMOLED screen, reliable sleep tracking, and comfortable all-day wear.
• Cons: No built-in GPS, slow app sync, mediocre heart rate accuracy for interval training, and proprietary charger.
• Who it’s for: Casual fitness users and budget-conscious buyers; not for serious athletes or GPS-dependent runners.

Final Verdict: Should You Buy It?

• Value score: 7.5/10 – competes well with Xiaomi Mi Band 8 and Fitbit-inspire-vs-amazfit-band-7-tested/” title=”Best Budget Fitness Trackers Under $100: Fitbit Inspire vs Amazfit Band 7 Tested”>Fitbit Inspire 3 at a lower price point.
• Best alternatives: For GPS, get the Amazfit Bip 5 ($89). For better HR accuracy, save for a Garmin Vivosmart 5.
• Bottom line: A solid entry-level tracker for step counting and sleep, but skip if you need advanced metrics or build quality.

Related: Review: Best Fitness Tracker 2026: Top 5 Wearable Gear Reviewed for Accuracy & Value

Written byEvan Cole

Evan Cole tests and reviews consumer electronics, fitness trackers, and audio gear for Pulse Gear Reviews. Every product goes through a structured evaluation covering build quality, performance benchmarks, battery life, and value for money.